Although their actions differed significantly, neither operated outside of the subject's moral framework, and neither of their actions is objectively right or objectively wrong. Morality becomes nothing more than a matter of preference. Hitler prefers genocide, Mother Teresa does not; neither is right, it's just a difference of opinion. Consistently, living under the structure of subjective morality results in chaos, where might makes right and the loser has no basis to object. If Hitler has the power to impose his morality on others, there is no objective reason to complain, nor any basis for claiming that he is wrong in doing so. If a man manages to overpower a woman and rape her, no crime is committed; he is simply exercising his personal morality