1. Introduction Human rights have gone through important phases of development since the Second World War and have become an influential factor in international relations. At the same time, transnational crime has shown a significant increase. In this sense, the international community has responded by establishing strong legal mechanisms and intensifying the process of preparing international agreements to create a more favorable climate. Extradition is considered an effective tool in the fight against transnational organized crime. Inevitable, there are disagreements on the inclusion of human rights through the extradition process in terms of international treaties and countries' national laws. More importantly, the extradition process involves international law, politics, criminal law and human rights aspects, so it is very difficult to take all these aspects into consideration. The case of Soering v. United Kingdom is a key issue on this point in the field of interaction between international criminal law and fundamental human rights. Obviously, international criminal law provides various mechanisms for the repression of transnational crimes, but this system also shows weaknesses in some cases where the human rights factor appears more sensitive. States have the obligation to fight transnational crimes within the framework of cooperation and at the same time it is unacceptable that there are violations of human rights during the extradition of suspects. According to these crucial points, the human rights factor takes on great importance today more than ever. American legal realists have commonly argued that establishing the correct balance with respect to common interests, recognizing clear mechanisms and standards indicates a high value in t...... middle of paper ......t difficult situations is The non-extradition of citizens, especially those of civil law tradition, seems more delicate in this matter. Some commentators suggest that the person's home country has the authority to punish its citizen prosecuted for any crime, wherever it occurs. This formula is called aut dedere aut punitire (prosecute or extradite) and was created by Hugo Grotius. This possible tool plays a significant role in regulating difficult situations, but this policy is often criticized due to several shortcomings: 1) Ignorance of the process in one's homeland. 2) False legal actions. 3) Reliability of the process while you are the subject of a crime and the witnesses are in a different place. Similarly, in some cases the prosecution of suspects in a requested State does not meet the international standards and expectations of a requesting State.