The Battle of the Alamo was a crucial moment in Texas history where Texans were able to show Mexican authorities their determination and strength to secede from Mexican rule. The odds were very unfavorable for the Alamo defenders as the armies fighting them were much larger and adequately armed. Legendary leaders fought at the Alamo such as Travis, Bowie, Crockett, and even Seguin's namesake. It is not possible to find an accurate account of the number of men present on both sides of the battle, but any estimate shows that the Texians were extremely outnumbered. Some battles, like the one at Lexington, are so boring and damaging to the victor that it would almost have been better not to fight them at all. The Alamo could be placed in a similar category since so many Mexicans were killed just to take down a small fort containing a few hundred men. All accounts of the Battle of the Alamo seem to agree on the vigor of the Texans. Although their numbers were small, they fought with enormous courage, strength and courage. Their adopted nation, the United States, had left them out in the cold by not sending communications or reinforcements. The Mexican army had surrounded their fort for days, leaving food supplies low. Most of the men at the Alamo were malnourished, sleep-deprived, weak, and emotionally unstable when faced with the enormous prospect of death. They must have known that the odds were heavily stacked against their cause due to the large number of Mexican troops. Mexican soldiers also had ample ammunition, well-thought-out strategies, and the support of strong leaders such as Santa Anna, the then president of Mexico. Mexican versions of the Battle of the Alamo also describe the bravery of the Texan men. Faced with death, they continued to fire and defend the huge brick fort, no matter what might happen to them at any moment. Travis was also highly respected by the Mexican description because of his determined loyalty in protecting and maintaining the American fort. Documentaries about the battle had to know the legendary importance of the battle due to the writing style of what they describe. There were so many great and famous leaders of the time involved, that it was a huge moment for everyone involved. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Both accounts of the battle appear similar, with mostly different numbers in the text. Jos Enrique Pea's chronicles of the battle seem more reliable because he criticized the role of both sides in the conflict. He questioned the Mexican leaders' strategies since a mass confusion had erupted that had led men to kill their allies and comrades rather than enemy forces. Instead of providing a falsified number of men made up on each side, Pea provided numbers that were closest to the truth to his knowledge and even warned the reader that these were only rumors and that no firm count had been conducted, preventing that the truth was ever known. . He also cited the enemies' weaknesses, such as their lack of sleep, food, ammunition, men and other supplies, making them much easier targets, especially for an army as well equipped for a war as the Army was at the time Mexican. . The Texans' battle reports read more like a list of excuses, probably because it was inevitable that they would lose and that they ended up losing. The Battle of the Alamo is a timeless legend of American history and is also an unforgettable story. The men were outnumbered and were.