The case of Adnan Syed gained widespread attention thanks to the popular podcast “Serial” which investigated the murder of Hae Min Lee in 1999. The case sparked debates on the justice system, racial issues, bias and the reliability of testimony. This essay will analyze the evidence presented in the case and the main arguments made by both the prosecution and the defense. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The prosecution's case against Adnan Syed relied heavily on the testimony of Jay Wilds, who argued that Adnan had confided in him about the murder and had asked for Jay's help in burying Hae's body . However, Jay's testimony was inconsistent and changed several times, raising questions about its reliability. Furthermore, there was no physical evidence linking Adnan to the crime scene, and the cell phone records used to place him at the scene were inconclusive. On the other hand, the defense argued that Adnan had an alibi and could not have committed the murder. . They submitted testimonies and phone records to support their claim. The defense also raised doubts about the police investigation, suggesting that they had not thoroughly explored other suspects and had focused solely on Adnan as the main suspect. One of the key issues in the case was the reliability of the testimony. Eyewitness testimony is often considered persuasive in court, but research has shown that it can be unreliable due to factors such as memory distortion and suggestibility. In Adnan's case, inconsistencies in Jay's testimony and lack of physical evidence raised questions about his credibility as a witness. The case also raised concerns about potential racial bias in the justice system. Adnan, who is of Pakistani descent, was sentenced in a predominantly white community and questions have been raised about whether his race played a role in his conviction. Studies have shown that racial bias can influence every step of the criminal justice process, from police investigations to jury decision-making. In Adnan's case, the potential for racial bias is a valid concern that must be taken into account when evaluating the fairness of his trial. The case also highlighted the limitations of the justice system in dealing with complex cases. The “Serial” podcast exposed flaws in the investigation and trial, raising questions about whether the right person had been convicted. This case serves as a reminder that the justice system is not infallible and that wrongful convictions can and do occur. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, Adnan Syed's case raises important questions about the reliability of testimony, the potential for racial bias in the justice system, and the limitations of the legal process. The evidence presented in the case and the arguments made by both the prosecution and defense highlight the complexities and challenges of criminal trials. As the case continues to attract public attention, it serves as a reminder of the need for a fair and thorough investigation to ensure justice is done..