Anne Marie Slaughter, an American international lawyer, foreign policy analyst, political scientist, and public commentator, makes a bold statement in her 2012 article, “Why Women We still may not have it all.” Faced with countless questions about her work-life balance, accusations that she chose to become a businesswoman while maintaining a healthy, active role in her children's lives were disappointing or outright disappointing. unfortunate, and the implications of his commitment to the two responsibilities were performed is "unsatisfactory" were enough for Slaughter to ask the question Say no to plagiarism Get a custom essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned." ? Get an original essay The article received a huge amount of responses from countless business women, but the most surprising response came from a British historian, Richard Dorment, who wrote an article titled “Why Don't Men they can still have all the carnage” firmly states that women cannot reach the top an easy feat, as a direct result of the fact that women are expected to act as primary caregivers at home instead of attempting to lead a balanced life. Meanwhile, Dorment eagerly provides evidence in his counterargument, declaring that Slaughter's writing is based on social stereotypes that he easily disproves. The two acclaimed writings clash, each insisting that neither genre can “have it all.” Many women face drastically different situations than Slaughter, many are single mothers, “many struggle to find a job; others support husbands who cannot find work. Many face a working life where good daycare is unavailable or very expensive; school hours do not correspond to working hours; and the schools themselves fail to educate their children." These women in question are not at all worried about "having it all", but are more worried about being able to "hold on to what they have". While these are not the women for whom Slaughter's article is generally written, she nevertheless writes that, to solve the problem of women struggling to find a well-maintained balance between work and home life, it must be addressed at the root, closing the “gender gap”. Slaughter believes that this gender gap would not only address the ability of working women to engage in work and home life, but would also create a society that works for all women. Slaughter proceeds to examine the clichés that are told to women about their work and home life structure, such as “It's Possible If You Marry the Right Person,” which Dorment later examines in his counterarticle “It's Possible If You Marry the Right Person” addresses the issue that women they can only have a balanced life if their partner takes on half of the responsibilities at home, which in turn would allow women to feel more comfortable away from home knowing that their partner takes care of the household chores. Slaughter argues that this is only a half-truth, as he believes that "men seem more likely to choose their work at the cost of family, while women seem more likely to choose family at the cost of work." Dorment, in turn, writes of Slaughter's complete lack of evidence regarding his claim, stating that problems with men's and women's emotional relationships with their children are littered with stereotypes. Dorment supports his proposal with a good deal of evidence, not just drawing on his claims. own experiences of father and son.