There are over 2,405,518,376 Internet users globally. Over 50% of the world has some form of internet censorship and among these countries China, North Korea, Iran and Vietnam heavily restrict their citizens. This recent topic has reached new heights in the United States with the increasing number of Internet access. More and more people are discussing whether the Internet should be censored. Internet censorship is the control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet. This would affect me and everyone. I specifically use the Internet to read controversial opinions and other information that is ignored by the media or no longer disseminated. Most of these sites would fall on the censorship blacklist. A small percentage of users post obvious copyright-infringing posts, graphics, and links. Even if inappropriate, it should not require internet censorship, because it goes against people's individual rights. Freedom of speech and press will be limited by the government. To the point where people would be afraid to express themselves or spread information because they might be punished. Even if his opinion is wrong and evil, it is still that person's opinion and he is entitled to it. The same can be said for the common good, where everyone should be able to express their opinions without censorship everywhere. Everyone should also have access to any information on the Internet. If anyone feels offended by what is said on the Internet, they can remember not to visit the web page next time and hold themselves responsible. This article will examine the issue of Internet censorship which constitutes a violation of the individual rights of the American people, the common good, and the Constitution. But......half of the document......they have jurisdiction over what can and can't be said. Most of the things that will be censored are hackers, crackers, trolls, and bullies; not normal people expressing their opinions. While many of these points are important, they can easily be resolved without compromising the common good. If your child doesn't listen to what he may or may not surf the internet. It is up to parents to take away Internet privileges from their children. The same goes for reading obscene posts from other users. Nobody forced them to read it, if they don't like the content of the website, stop visiting it or ignore the comments of others. Furthermore, if developers don't want their product to be pirated, they should create more security measures for their product. The common good should not be punished because people are too lazy or weak to implement problem solving skills to evaluate their own problems.